"You can be born and live so bad for so little, or get to ninety ' years as a train, but when your time comes, do not change much: it is always to die without dignity, is horrible anyway. You can live with dignity, to die rather not. " More or less like Dr. House has just said with his usual rough correctness (mioddio because I appreciate) the patient refuses further analysis to go home "to die with dignity."
I was never able to sum up so effectively because they never understood the more rational and more I tried to put myself in the shoes of so unspeakable and prolonged suffering, more imagined that there is no hope (Absence de what? "Nobody Out Alive here "- Jim Morrison dixit), or how debilitating it is not independent (after all, however, is the natural state of many, including me ..) etc.etc., nevertheless, remained in me a background of skepticism of indispensable ' euthanasia and all its highly rational justification.
Ora ho la risposta: l'è istess .
Morire - per incidente o agonizzando - è spesso insopportabile e sempre privo di dignità; il fatto può terrorizzare, ma non cambia le cose. E' in fondo il perchè the great equalizer viene considerato argomento indecente. Al punto da doverlo eliminare, anticipandone l'ineluttabilità mediante un atto di volontà.
Come tante verità non è per nulla consolante, ma trovo la sua una diagnosi ancora una volta ineccepibile, dottor House.
PS.: Aderisco alla campagna di Perla , ho abolito il controllo parole nei commenti.
0 comments:
Post a Comment